Home Bio Photos General Contact

Incompatibility 

Of Alleged Transgender "Rights"

With Fundamental Humans Rights

Kevin Aylward B.Sc.

Abstract

This paper summarizes the arguments in other papers linked below, as to  positions that the alleged rights claimed of many trans activists are inherently incompatible with the fundamental human rights of all others. An effective definition of transphobia, as actually practiced by many radical trans activist hate groups is used to illustrate the issue.

This is not to say that all transgender individuals agree with definition or support this viewpoint in any way, however, it is the trans radical activists that actually matter in the sense is that it is they that implement their hate campaigns against anyone that simply disagrees with their particular, bigoted, at odd with physical reality, viewpoints,. 

Trans Activist Fundamental Demands

1 "Transwomen are women" without exception.

2 Transmen are men" without exception

The fundamental problems with these assertions are that "woman" and "men" are scientifically defined by biologically characteristics, for example, "female" is defined as that animal type of the species that carries the offspring, and woman is defined as "adult human female", with "male" defined as that animal type that does not carry the species.

Thus assertions 1 & 2 are contradictory to physical reality and thus are inherently false. This makes resolution of the trans activist lobby demands inherently irresolvable within the constraints of preserving the fundamental human rights of everyone else.

In an attempt to avoid the contradiction with physical reality, the trans activists posit that "woman" is not dependant on biology but defined by some other social construction. The flaw in this approach is described here,  Gender & Biology

Transphobic

Thus from the above, anyone that expresses these views are automatically considered a transphobe if the above points 1 & 2 are not accepted..

1 Any heterosexual male that states "I am just not sexually attracted to those with penises, so thanks for the offer, but no thanks"

2 Any heterosexual female that states "I am just not sexually attracted to those with vaginas, so thanks for the offer, but no thanks"

3 Any homosexual female that states "I am just not sexually attracted to those with penises, so thanks for the offer, but no thanks"

4 Any homosexual male that states "I am just not sexually attracted to those with vaginas, so thanks for the offer, but no thanks"

5 When a woman objects to a man telling her what it is to be a woman

6 Presenting definitions of transphobia that present radical trans activists in disrepute.

Thus the transgender alleged "rights" infringe on the ECHR 3, 10 & 11 as noted here:

The European Charter Of Human Rights

Article 3 - Right to the integrity of the person

1. Everyone has the right to respect for his or her physical and mental integrity.

Article 10 -  Freedom of thought, conscience and religion

1. Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief, in worship, teaching, practice and observance. 

Article 11 - Freedom of expression and information

1 Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.

The trans activist lobby's position is that their right to state "transwoman are woman" negates the equal right for anyone else to state "transwoman are men".

The response from the trans activist is that the denier of their position is denying their right to exist, that is their right to consider themselves mentally as how they perceive a woman is. However, if this were so, the trans activist position must also be denying the other's existence by not recognizing that the others right to consider their own view as to how they perceive what a woman is.

Of course both denials of non existence are false. Each person just has their own view as to what constitutes a woman. One of these views is based on scientific facts, and the other based on the same psychological issues that those that believe that they are Elvis or Napoleon incur.  

Discussion

It is clear that the trans radical activists viewpoints is blatantly, homophobic, heterophobic, misogynistic, hateful, and completely delusional. In reality, the trans activists alleged "rights" are assertions of privileges. 

It is a position where all sense of reality has been lost. It's a classic example of gaslighting, where the general population has been induced to believe that it is they that have a problem with simply being heterosexual or homosexual.  

The irrationality of the radical trans activists is based on, essentially, their denial that biological sex even exists, such that ones own innate sexual preferences are invalid. 

Links

Human Rights & The Trans Lobby 

Gender & Biology

Social & Physical Constructs

Equality Act

 

© Kevin Aylward 2021

This work may be freely published provided it is done so without charge

so long as this source is noted

Website last modified 27th March 2021

www.kevinaylward.co.uk